Explore

Reviews By Cruiseline

More

My Husband Have Travelled Extensively On Cruises..

Would You Like To Add A Comment About This Review?

  • Davies, Llandudno - Commented on this review

    447 nights on regent. sure it wasn't 448?

    - Was this comment useful or
    4 of 177 found this useful

    • Jason, Chipping Camden Commented on a comment by Davies (04 Nov 17 22:19)

      What a sick nasty creature you clearly are.

      - Was this comment useful or
      115 of 132 found this useful

    • Smith, Childswickham Commented on a comment by Davies (05 Nov 17 19:24)

      Another totally unnecessary posting , why do you do it .

      - Was this comment useful or
      82 of 82 found this useful

  • horton, chipping campden - Commented on this review

    Positive!!!

    - Was this comment useful or
    160 of 161 found this useful

  • Evans, - Commented on this review

    Pardon my denseness, but what is sick or nasty about 448, Jason? 666 I could understand, but 448? I can only assume this is a private feud?

    - Was this comment useful or
    49 of 133 found this useful

    • Jason, Chipping Camden Commented on a comment by Evans (05 Nov 17 14:43)

      Good that we are in agreement about one thing.

      - Was this comment useful or
      47 of 75 found this useful

      • Evans, Commented on a comment by Jason (05 Nov 17 18:26)

        If I got the significance of Davies's post and your response, I might well agree, but I really don't understand it!

        - Was this comment useful or
        54 of 155 found this useful

        • Jason, Chipping Camden Commented on a comment by Evans (06 Nov 17 15:00)

          I have only commented a couple of times previously on this website and was just supporting my near neighbour who was nice enough to volunteer time to give a review. Davis is known to be one of the serial abusers of reviewers as you can see if you look back. His comment was, as usual, just a sarcastic jibe - sniggering at the precision of 447 in Horton’s review! Why is his sarcasm necessary? It is of NO help to people reading reviews to help them choose cruises. It is for his own nasty self. Smith, Childswickham saw that. Shame you were too dense to see it.

          - Was this comment useful or
          92 of 94 found this useful

          • Evans, Commented on a comment by Jason (06 Nov 17 23:37)

            So sorry, Jason! Having never seen Davies's posts before, I was not familiar with his/her sarcasm, so do please forgive my thickness thinking there was trolling going on by the wrong person. I was going to mention that the headline should read 'My husband has travelled extensively on cruises', or indeed 'My husbands have...', but don't wish to be seen as sarcastic, a member of the grammar police or anti dyslexic. May your friend and his or her husband one day get to night 448 on Regent. Best wishes to you all.

            - Was this comment useful or
            128 of 131 found this useful